Do couples look alike more as time passes? A new study says no.

Do couples really start to look alike? A new study debunks the popular idea that couples start to resemble each other more as time passes.

Do couples look alike more and more as time passes? Quite a few online articles suggest that spouses’ faces start to resemble each other more with the passage of time.

Even a fair amount of psychological literature makes the same claim, perhaps most notably one widely-cited paper from 1987.

The idea is that because married couples live in the same environments, engage in many of the same activities, eat the same food, and mimic each other’s expressions, their facial appearances should converge over time.

But that seminal 1987 paper was based on only 12 couples, and its findings have never been replicated.

That prompted Stanford University researchers Pin Pin Tea-makorn and Michał Kosiński to take a new look.

In their new paper published today in the Nature journal Scientific Reports, they examined a sample of 517 couples.

They used facial images taken at the beginning of the marriage and then decades later (on average 49 years later).

517 couples traced over time

The researchers collected images of 517 couples from a variety of public sources.

These included anniversary announcements in newspapers (392, via the website Newspaper Archive), Google search results (102), and 23 public profiles from the genealogy site Ancestry.com.

They used two facial images of each spouse.

One one taken within two years of the wedding, the other taken between 20 and 69 years later.

Do couples really start to look alike? Asking human and algorithmic judges

The pairs of photographs were analyzed for facial similarity by humans, and also by facial recognition software.

The 153 human judges came from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk crowdsourcing marketplace.

These raters ranked the facial similarity on a scale of one to six.

The photos also underwent analysis by a facial recognition algorithm called VGGFace2.

This is a co-called “deep neural network” that the University of Oxford develops and maintains.

Past research has found that it outperforms humans in judging facial similarity.

No evidence that spouses resemble each other more over time

While the researchers showed that spouses’ faces do indeed tend to be similar, they do not become any more similar over time.

In other words, they did not find any evidence for the so-called “convergence in physical appearance hypothesis.”

“Spouses’ faces did not become more similar with time,” they write. “In fact, according to human judges, spouses’ faces became slightly less similar with time,” though this difference was relatively small.

Likewise, the length of time between the photos did not play any role in the similarity or dissimilarity of the pictures. “Spouses’ faces tended to be similar, but did not become more similar with time, regardless of the time span between the first and the second set of pictures,” they write.

Debunking Psych 101

“When we started this project, I was convinced that we will easily find evidence for the convergence in facial appearance,” said co-author Pin Pin Tea-makorn. “This is one of those theories that all undergrads learn in their Psych 101.”

“Also, it sounds rather intuitive,” she said. “Spouses tend to spend much time together, have similar hobbies and diet, so it is to be expected that they should grow more alike with time.”

“Nevertheless, we were surprised that despite using a very large sample of facial images and very sensitive measurements of facial similarity, we could not find any evidence for convergence,” she said.

Do People’s Beliefs in Astrology Impact Their Perception of Couples Looking Alike?

Many studies have found that astrology believers are narcissistic.

When it comes to the perception of couples looking alike, astrology believers may be more likely to believe in the concept of soulmates and physical similarities as a result of their astrological beliefs.

Their perception of couples looking alike may be impacted by their faith in astrology.

How Does Political Identity Shape the Perception of Couples Looking Alike Over Time?

Many researchers have conducted a study on American identity shaping politics, but one lesser-explored aspect is how political identity affects perception of couples looking alike over time.

It can influence how individuals view such couples, impacting their perceptions and judgments based on their political beliefs and affiliations.

Revisiting psychological lore

Likewise, co-author Michal Kosinski hopes this study can encourage a more detailed look at other commonly accepted psychological truths.

“I think that scholars should spend more time validating widespread psychological theories,” he said. “Many are based on scanty evidence and studies that would not be considered appropriate today.”

“Much of what we are teaching to students, business leaders and policymakers is based on rather weak evidence,” he said.

As the researchers summarize in the paper, “Spouses’ faces are similar but do not converge with time.

This brings facial appearance in line with other traits — such as interests, personality, intelligence, attitudes, values, and well-being — which show initial similarity but do not converge over time.”


More recent psychology news:

  • Can men and women can be best friends? A new study finds that women are considerably more likely than men to even have a best friend.
  • Status envy: a new study finds that people envy others’ social status more than their wealth.
  • Nomophobia statistics: a new study finds “nomophobia” – the fear of not having your phone – affects 89% of college students.

Study: “Spouses’ faces are similar but do not become more similar with time”
Authors:
Pin Pin Tea-makorn and Michal Kosinski
Published in:
Nature Scientific Reports
Publication date: October 12, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73971-8
Photo: by Carly Rae Hobbins via Unsplash

Avatar photo

Douglas Heingartner

Douglas Heingartner, the editor of SuchScience.org, is a journalist based in Amsterdam. He has written about science, technology, and more for publications including The New York Times, The Economist, Wired, the BBC, The Washington Post, New Scientist, The Associated Press, IEEE Spectrum, Quartz, The Village Voice, The Los Angeles Times, Frieze, and others. His Google Scholar profile is here, his LinkedIn profile is here, and his Muck Rack profile is here.